Why we don't sell peptides
Nearly every peptide website is operated by, or funded by, a company that sells peptides. That business model rewards enthusiasm and punishes caution. Peptivoice takes the opposite constraint: we never sell compounds, and we never accept sponsorship, free product, or advertising from companies that do - including “research chemical” vendors, whatever the label says.
How claims are sourced
- Efficacy and safety claims cite peer-reviewed publications (NEJM, Lancet, PubMed-indexed journals) or official regulator statements - not vendor blogs or forum consensus.
- Regulatory claims cite the FDA, state boards, or primary legal documents, with dates. Regulation moves; our pages carry a “last updated” month.
- Where the evidence is animal-only or absent - which is common in this field - we say so in the opening section, not a footnote.
Medical review
Health-related pages are reviewed by a licensed physician before being marked “medically reviewed”, and the reviewer is named on each page. Review covers medical accuracy; it does not turn any page into medical advice.
Calculators are math, not medicine
Our tools convert the numbers you enter. They never suggest, default, or auto-fill a dose. They flag results that are hard to measure accurately, because the FDA has documented real hospitalizations from unit-conversion errors. No tool on this site makes any compound safe, legal, or recommended.
If we ever add affiliate links
Should we one day recommend licensed telehealth clinics with referral compensation, every such page will carry a disclosure at the top of the page (per FTC Endorsement Guides), the ranking methodology will be published, and compensation will never reorder a ranking. We will never link to sellers of unapproved compounds - no exceptions.
Corrections
Factual errors are corrected in place with a note. If a regulator contradicts something we published, the correction gets the same prominence as the original claim.